EXHIBIT 6.
I say that the FCO cable (EXHIBIT 1), proves that the Governor of Hong Kong, who brings the prosecution on behalf of the Crown, knew that the request was corrupt, and warned The Foreign Secretary accordingly.
I say that the cable shows the extent of Warwick Reids control and direction of the investigation and prosecution.
I say that Reid knew that the evidence was selective and may well have known that the Malaysian Government would deal with the rest of the potential evidence, in the manner evidenced in the BBMB letter.
I say that the BBMB letter, known to the FCO, and to the HK authorities, on the face of it, formally destroys any fairness or balance in the case, and more probably, was to be expected ever since the corrupt Reid made his biased and corrupt selection of evidence, as part of an agreement between HK, Malaysia and UK, in the first place.
I say that the police department letters were legally known to the Crown, as was both the role and objective of Razaleigh in the Malaysian prosecution request. At the time the request was made there was prima facie evidence in the 4 letters, that it appears that Razaleigh had taken substantial bribes from George Tan and was implicated, by motive and by the convicted murderers original confession, in the murder of the auditor Jalil lbrahim.
I say that the grant of criminal immunity made to the Crown's principle witness, Jaafar, was made corruptly by Warwick Reid, in collusion with the Malaysian authorities, who themselves granted the said Jaafar civil immunity.
Despite Jaffars confession in open court that he had lied to the Hong Kong authorities and his employers (BBMB) and their solicitors after the granting of said immunities.The
immunities have not been revoked.
1
Page 60Page 61