*TRANSFERRED FROM HICC 370/11 ©*

HKC370/13

Мав

Mak Pan

26/6

JUN 1991

Lette to mod

Bus July

Par 2716

FROM: Miss S Brooks

Legal Counsellor 270 3069

K199

DATE: 26 June 1991

CC:

Mr Chamberlain

6

Ms Major

HKD

CROWN PROCEEDINGS ORDINANCE

A Claims against British Forces

re para 2

Seen 16/7 Spike to MOD. They their larryers for a

ave chasing

приго

My comments on the Bill to amend the Crown Proceedings Ordinance are as follows.

1.

11

25 16/7

It is

a) Section 7 A (2)(a) of the Bill refers to "an imminent national danger

This is language drawn from Section 2(2)(a) of the Crown Proceedings (Armed Forces) Act 1987. I am unclear whether "national" is appropriate. not clear to me whether the danger referred to is intended to be one which threatens Hong Kong or the UK. If it threatens the UK, the word "national" is acceptable, whereas it is not in the case of Hong Kong. I think it is probably a danger threatening the UK but if it is one which threatens Hong Kong, the wording would have to be amended to read, for example "an imminent danger threatening Hong Kong." I suggest you check with the MOD what they consider should be inserted.

b) Section 7 A (2)(b) of the Bill. I suggest, as a matter of grammar, deleting "of" in the second line.

c) It is unclear to me why there is no equivalent in the Bill to sections 2(4) and 5(2)(a) and (b) of the 1987 Act. Perhaps we could ask Hong Kong.

d) I am also unclear why Section 8(6) of the Crown Proceedings Ordinance is to be repealed. Section 8 of the Ordinance as a whole ceases to have effect with the exception of matters arising before the commencement of the Ordinance which is at present the Bill, unless revived by Order of the Governor. I see no reason why Section 3(6) should not similarly cease to have effect rather than be repealed. does it seem to be consequential on the enactment of new section 8 A of the Bill since section 8 A is concerned with Section 34 of the Ordinance. Section 8(6) of the Ordinance relates only to Section 8 and is not connected with Section 34. Let us ask Hong Kong.

Nor

/2.

Share This Page