were sent direct to the PM. In this! case, it would be for ver to decide Whether we should forward them the Private office to await their decision a whether or not they Jelt a reply from the repiting pm would be necessary. Alternatively, we could send a departmental

reply 18

рт

Mr Chua 'Cas has

ben done mi ire

mi The pest). I would

prefer the second option.

3.

5. Unfortunately HKG have not fold 18thar Chua is insane. They have havere remarked that he Tsa "chronic nuisance! The なん

background brief supplied by HIG bears witness to the full extat of this. I recommend therefore that we a departmental repin' is given V lo chưa

Page 45Page 46

Share This Page