Reference
こ
2.
CODE 18-77
Mr Anderson
Second Legal Adviser
DOUBLE FLAGGING OF HONG KONG REGISTERED VESSELS
1.
Please see the attached papers which have been sent under cover of а letter from Our Embassy in Bonn. The German authorities ask whether the Hong Kong Merchant Shipping (Registration) Ordinance which requires Hong Kong registered ships to fly both the red ensign and the blue ensign with Hong Kong armorial bearings contradicts Section 6 of the UN Convention on the High Seas 1958 (Article 92 of UNLOSC), which requires ships to fly the flag of one State only!
2. They also ask which is the responsible registry within the terms of the High Seas Convention.
3. I should imagine that the answer is that Hong Kong is not a 'State', therefore Hong Kong ships are only flying the flag of one State, ie the UK. The responsible registry would, however, be Hong Kong. That said, Hong Kong Department advise me that this whole question of the flagging of Hong Kong ships is under discussion between DTp and Hong Kong. Ms Barrett may have some knowledge of these talks.
P Williams
AMD
270.2638 WHMZ15
30 September 1991
сс
I
M-liörden, HICS.
ung Rps available mit
Are
not I
ww
the
busis If thing. I think
По Витен
suggested to furrett
grades.
ули
Pane Will
Ms Barrett, Legal Advisers (without enclosures) And 270.1638
22110
Ball, 2, 24/10
ams
your interpretation ie.
with
)
Hke shipp
agree not a state.
Flag of breach of
Are
WHMZ11
21 Oct 91 since
MIC
anly flying and the me state ie, the Uk, so there is no
UNCLOS, Art 92.
I
know that
Problems which
with the
Love
there has been same drinssian of
criser vnde uic law in connectio new flagging arrangements. I have not been involved. I believe Miss Bradlee advised, and suggest you obtain
Mr Riordan, HID. JMB 18/10
the
papers
from