Exhibit 10
PROPOSED RTHKC PERFORMANCE EVALUATION GUIDELINES
· MANAGERIAL STAFF
ILLUSTRATIVE
CRITERIA
EVALUATION
POOR
Specific job-
Technical skill
related
General
Creativity
Managerial ability
People development
Communications
-
Judgment
-
Does not understand equipment/discipline; unwilling to do research
Little attempt to innovate; limited knowledge of genres
Consistently over budget and/or behind schedule
Has difficulty listening and coaching
Projects only modest conviction; has difficulty coordinating with other
units
BELOW AVERAGE
-
Basic knowledge of techniques; requires little guidance
Produces acceptable work within traditional formats
Can manage own
activities; coordinates effectively
Gives guidance when required
Able to make simple presentations; consults others to reach consensus
Does not understand editorial and resource guidelines
Follows explicit guidelines well; has moderate impact
AVERAGE
-
-
-
Can complete most projects independently
Work has
measurable impact; extensive use of new formats and techniques
Completes work on time and within budget consistently
is a good team player; takes and gives coaching as appropriate
Assists in negotiations; influences team members with well- reasoned opinions
Can generally meet
specific targets; interprets broad guidelines well
ABOVE AVERAGE
-
Command of wide range of skills; has specialised expertise
Defines new formats for treatment of subject; work recognised by peers for impact
Moots and exceeds all commitments; works effectively on multiple projects
Adds value through morale building; perceived as counsellor by staff
Leads discussions; makes Board presentations
-
Judgments have
EXCELLENT
-
-
Expert knowledge of
techniques; often
called on for assistance by peers
Work wins awards; recognised by peers as thought leader
independently manages multiple projects to demanding time and budget constraints
Is a team leader;
makes a constant
effort to increase team accomplishments
Represents RTHKC publicly on controversial issues
significant short-term
impact; superiors entrust significant responsibility
Sets overall editorial
and managerial principies; often delegated superior's
role