Dr Riglets fi
Pai
RESTRICTED
14+)
Reference
7/10
From: D S FISH
(Ext 3444)
Date: 4 October 1991
cc Mr Ricketts Mr Burns
HKB 233/1
Mr M Stone
Hong Kong Department/FCO
143
HMOCS LETTER FROM THE TREASURY
1.
2.
Thank you for sending me a copy of your minute of 1 October.
Although we seem to have access to all the material requested by the Treasury it is a time-consuming business to bring it all together. We hope to be able to let you have it early next week.
3. Overall, the Treasury response was almost exactly what I expected. It was inevitable that they would question the need for a sterling safeguard; not because of Bretton Woods but because it has financial implications for HMG. Even when we convince them that some pension protection must be on offer, they will argue, with much support from history, that Hong Kong should foot the bill.
4.
The reference to the transfer of assets as well as liabilities is consistent with the Treasury approach from start. The exchanges are headed in
in the
the direction we both anticipated. The Treasury will not be convinced that Hong Kong cannot pay and the politicians will have to break the deadlock.
D S FISH
یا شو
диц
Overseas Pensions Department
4 October 1991
RESTRICTED