כי
F
CONFIDENTIAL
They will
suggest we concentrate, initially at least, on files from 1988 to 1991 inclusive (earlier files will have been sent by
departments to LRD). Departments and posts will be asked to
identify relevant documents and submit returns briefly
describing the nature and contents of each document.
not be asked to submit copies of the documents themselves at
this stage.
ERD will use these returns to prepare a chronology and to identify any documents which might subsequently have to
be made available to the Inquiry.
6.
The UK's Dependent Territories (DTs) are, of course, in a slightly different category. The DTS have their own government and domestic legislation which may, in some cases, prevent disclosure of banking information. It would not, therefore,
seem appropriate for us to ask the Governors to supply the FCO with similar returns. However, we know that the Inquiry wishes
to approach the relevant authorities in the Caymans. We have
suggested that they write directly to the Governor whilst
offering our assistance in arranging delivery of the letter.
BCCI also had branches in Gibraltar and Hong Kong. It would
seem sensible to suggest to the Inquiry that if they wish to approach other DTS they should, likewise, contact the relevant
authorities by writing directly to the respective Governors.
We would, of course, encourage our DTs to offer the Inquiry every possible assistance. I suggest that the PUS cover this point in his letter of acknowledgement to the Secretary of the Inquiry. WIAD, SED, HKD and Legal Advisers agree.
7.
I have asked PUSD to advise the PUS separately on the intelligence aspect of all this (my minute of 11 September to
Mr Callan refers).
адий 169asoj e
Jurvably he
R B Bone
vilk
This
sadrzis
ناسم
سی
і
in CONFIDENTIAL
small
me
the
Though
trand shink.
Lintah
.P. Donne 11/9/91
isti
в.
川alei