080
F.48
Is the Governor's
XIV cele juble
ndex
This question lies at the neart of this appeal. if
the Governor's power under Article
13
is not implieuly delegacie cut
Governc! Personall
XIV of the Letters Fatent.
is only excerisable cy the
then it seems to
islative woners Conferreo
that the
ཀ 0,
with he
under Article
Pass Legislation, purpo
ここ
end consent
Fay not
the Lealelutive Council,
exercised
↓
oking them celegable.
enlarge his Article AI. powers y withough is well settled that Article 11 confere plenary
islative
ccrtull zesrivations,
the
་ ་
*ncse
that the.
not DE
Council
tions
exercises
con
airenaments
the Lé
fotent to which they owe theil
Trus
rticle II
office
$4
Inter
Letters Patent
and
༣
10
the Governor
perior. :
tenour ci
tiesc
Provides:
..
And
reirs
نتان
wo hereb
Authority,
Alter, or amer..
It follows
Old
reserve
Cursive...
Successore full +
tine
to
hese
ܝ,.
time, to revoke,
letters Patent
set.
C
the rticls
IV
power
properly to se construed
as conteiring a purely personal and
virtue of the
C
non delegacle power upor the Governo: then it can only be the Crown which mas the relevant
Prerogative, to enlarge the Governor's power to appoint by
nengment of Article XIV declaring that the Governor's power is celegacle: c.i. Hex v. To Lam Sin (1952) 3 HKLM 1 at p.12
V. L1 Bun (1957) HKLM CY. This ..as the course adopted in 1960 subsequent to the concession by Crown. Counsel 13 Ho Po Sang v. The Director of Public Works (1959) HKLR 032 that the Governor's power under Article Xili to nake and execute grants and dispositions of land was not Jelegacle.
and Kea