y:
n.
the most important topic and the least
The Presidency will table a further
frontiers and said that
id.
instigation a teach in for the 12 will be
e it on arrival
to the original questionnaire
ssive summary which at points begged the
xercise
hrough since the meeting n's demographic position was
: there was no deficit ithout harping on the United Kingdom picked up the French
desired process: the ntractability of agreeing
here could still be room for
tibility. If resident 3CNs ughout the EC, then there immigration policies. That !cessary to attempt only the
which simply recorded without comment
hister's remarks in March.
e of the available papers offered a basis dinators, still less the FAC. On the
ed that the papers, the thought they had , and the interaction also with growing ficulties over immigration in a number
approaches (except for the Commission,
y Taschner) to Article 8A less
ch claimed 8A did no more than confer a
residence 3CNS, and expressed doubt ever be practicable to adopt identical Even the Dutch took a notably could be achieved would take a long
to take the broadest possible view and
dination.
how these exchanges will
e the Chairman, I would seek abling my promised paper. and, clearly, how to take the the agenda for our bilateral ars their interpretation is ith one more shove they could n I do not expect Cartesian tly. The point remains,
isolated as we were
ic political concern with e less discriminating
room for the Germans and the Italians.
ly to their paper: if states were not en there had to be agreement about
priorities. The Italians - evidently terial instructions - acknowledged that
ment was the opposition that ich went through Co-
I paper (WG1
(WG1 629) circulated tions previously smoothed
: meeting. The consequence