}
CONFIDENTIAL
SECRETARY
OF STATE
effectively be run by the Hong Kong Government who so far have shown little interest in the position of the garrison, taking the view
that this is a matter for HMG. Other factors also need to be taken
into account, such as the cost of having to deploy large numbers of
troops from the UK in the even of a major run-out of staff which would be substantial; and the reliance of the garrison on its locally entered civilian staff who could not take advantage of any scheme transferring uniformed staff to the mainstream armed forces
(even if the very real practical problems of the latter could be overcome). When OD (K) does meet I could of course expand on all these points.
4. I can understand your difficulties with aspects of the proposals in my note of 21st December but I consider that it is very important that we do our utmost to make some specific provision for these garrison staff. I believe the right way forward is for our two departments to pursue the matter bilaterally in the light of the proposals in your paper about the shape of the overall scheme. If
you and other OD (K) colleagues agree, my officials will contact
yours to arrange early discussions.
5. I have sent copies of this minute to other members of OD (K) and
to Sir Robin Butler.
6th March 1990
Ministry of Defence
R
(TK)
CONFIDENTIAL
2