4

1

the Chinese authorities have some concern about the Bill

and we have had many

contacts with the Chinese side

I cannot

through a number of channels, including discussions in the

Joint Liaison Group and on

on informal occasions. Both the

White Bill and the Bill now before Members have been given

to the Chinese side and explained to them.

emphasise enough that one of our overriding principles in

enacting this piece of legislation has been and will be to

ensure that the final product fulfils our obligations

under the Joint Declaration and that it will last beyond

We can see no better way than to enact a

comprehensive Bill of Rights.

1997.

6.

The proposed freeze period is an area of major

interest to the public. The majority of written

submissions and DB members who expressed a view on

on this

issue are opposed to a two-year freeze period. Some have

suggested that there should be no freeze period at all.

The LegCo Ad Hoc Group has recommended that there should

be a selective freeze for one year achieved by listing in

a schedule the ordinances likely to be

be affected by the

Bill of Rights, and that the freeze can be extended, upon

the approval of this Council for another year.

7.

The

freeze

is

necessary

to avoid

the

effects of

legislative and

operational

destabilising

vacuums which may occur if statutory laws are found to be

Share This Page