+
CONFIDENTIAL
self-executing,
instead
20
機密
of being merely a directive
to
require the enactment of laws. On balance, we propose to leave the texts alone, especially if the recommendation in paragraph below is adopted.
43.
This
However,
Another problem is with Article
Article 17 which
which states
that propaganda for war or advocacy of national, racial or religious hatred "shall be prohibited by law." Article corresponds to Article 20 of the ICCPR.
because of a reservation, the Government is under по obligation to introduce "further legislation" in respect of Article 20 of the ICCPR. The White Bill attempted to
a provision
reflect this reservation by incorporating
(Clause 13) to the effect that there is no obligation to legislate further in respect of Article 17. However, the Administration now believes that the Bill does not reflect
the international reservation, since Article 17 is itself
likely to be construed as being "further legislation" in
respect of Article 20 of the ICCPR. If this is so, the
Bill does more than implement the obligations of the Government under the ICCPR as applied in Hong Kong. If Article 17 is not construed as "further legislation" but as
merely creating an obligation to legislate in respect of propaganda for war (etc), that obligation contradicts Clause 13 which says there is no such obligation. Neither construction produces a desirable result. It can therefore
be argued that Article 17 and Clause 13 should be deleted
from the Bill.
44.
If Article 17 and Clause 13 are retained, this can be defended by the argument that the ICCPR reservation does
not necessarily preclude the enactment of further legislation. However, the Chinese could rightly claim that
the BOR does more than the Government is required to do
CONFIDENTIAL 機密
20