which poaching was no longer worthwhile.

But he also said

that there had been a brief resurgence of poaching in East

Africa immediately after our Reservation was entered because

poachers had thought that world markets had opened up

again.

7. The stock of ivory in Hong Kong on 17 January stood at

474 tonnes 150 tonnes of worked ivory and 324 tonnes of

raw ivory. The difference of 196 tonnes from the original

estimate at the time of the CITES Conference was attributed

to the availability of more accurate data since the

introduction of possession licencing on 12 January (the 670

tonne figure was based on estimates) and the export of a small quantity of ivory in the intervening three months.

However, only some 358 tonnes was available for export as

the remaining 116 tonnes did not have CITES documentation.

There were a number of reasons for this, eg the ivory was

imported before the Convention came into force or

documentation was lost in the course of the numerous

transfers between traders. But whatever the reasons this

was embarrasing as we had previously stated that all ivory

had been imported in accordance with CITES procedures, and

we had no proof that this was the case.

8.

The Reservation was withdrawn as we had promised on 18 July. In terms of its stated objectives it was not very successful. Because of the collapse of the world markets for ivory Hong Kong was only able to export 8.59 tonnes. As a result, there is still pressure from the ivory traders for compensation from HKG or HMG. Legislative Councillors are

half heartedly supporting their case but we do not consider that any action will be required. A retraining scheme for ex-ivory workers has been established to place

-

JE5AAY

/them

Share This Page