ADMINISTRATION IN CONFIDENCE
COVERING CONFIDENTIAL
RECEPTIONIST AND DRIVER (CONT'D)
6.
We
there
was
leaving the
also noted the Post's concern on security grounds
risk in
unwatched portico
front
that for
unspecified periods.
7.
After
these weighing
factors, we
concluded
that the
most of disruption of work patterns was something the Post for
the reduced the time had the capacity to cope with even with input from the DS10 Registrar. But during periods of pressure it This and the devaluation of the may cause some real difficulty. expensively installed security control and protection by having a permanent Receptionist tipped the balance in favour retaining both posts.
8.
not of
Unfortunately, there is limited scope in JLG for utilising the identified underloading. Co-location with BTC would make it basic clerical cost-effective to give routine distribution and tasks etc.. to the Receptionist and the Driver. At present the
between JLG and BTC renders this distance
But nugatory.
both Posts should not lose sight of this spare capacity.
-
ADMINISTRATION IN CONFIDENCE
COVERING CONFIDENTIAL