CONFIDENTIAL

of premature retirement resulting from constitutional change, they

will receive compensation from the government of the territory

concerned".

6.

The 1960 White Paper stated that the terms of future compensation schemes should remain a matter to be settled in the

light or circumstances prevailing in each territory, but set out the

broad principles that members of HMOCS should be entitled to retire

with compensation for the loss of a career under the protection of

the Secreary of State, and that compensation schemes should provide

an inducement to officers to continue to serve so long as their

services were required. It also announced a scheme of financial

assistance, including help with the cost of compensation, for dependent territories. Hong Kong, along with the Bahamas, Bermuda

and Brunei, was excluded from the scheme of financial assistance "at

least for the present". The relevant extracts are attached.

7.

Compensation schemes were normally introduced in two stages: a

limited scheme, to cover compulsory retirement to faciliate the localisation of posts before independence; and a general scheme, offering HMOCS officials the option to retire at independence or later with immediate payment of pensions. Compensation for loss of

career and other factors was given on an actuarial basis. The compensation was available to all HMOCS officers, irrespective of

whether they stayed on or not. It was normally paid in several

annual instalments and contained an inducement to stay on in that if

the officer stayed on in employment, the compensation could be

adjusted upwards.

8.

The circumstances of Hong Kong are of course different from

previous cases because the territory will not become independent. Furthermore the Joint Declaration on Hong Kong guarantees a continuing career for serving officers on no worse terms than those prevailing before. But Ministers have consistently stated since the signature of the Joint Declaration on Hong Kong that the transfer of

sovereignty in 1997 raises issues regarding HMOCS comparable to

CONFIDENTIAL

WEDABH/3

Share This Page