the main differences between the strategy the UPGC and the indicative options noted by the an increase in degree places at HKU (from 10,000 to 11,500 fte); a decrease in the provision of such places at CUHK (from 12,000 to 11,500 fte); and a lower percentage of degree level places at the polytechnics (from 75% to 65%). The reasons for the recommended strategy are
indicative options were drawn up, it owing to site constraints, HKU's limited to 10,000 fte. It has now that land can be made available for
(a) at the time the
was assumed that, capacity would be been confirmed expansion;
(b)
(c)
the indicative option for CUHK envisaged growth at CUHK to 12,000 fte with a continuation of the present four-year curriculum. CUHK has subsequently decided to introduce a credit unit system, with effect from 1991, which will permit A-level students to graduate, as a norm, in three years.
(A progress report on the implementation of Government's decisions on the revised structure of tertiary education is at Annex J of the UPGC report). In the circumstances, and subject to compliance with Government's decisions arising its consideration of Education Commission Report No. 3 (leading to introduction of three-year courses at CUHK, based on post-Secondary seven entry), the UPGC considers it desirable for both HKU and CUHK to expand at a similar rate. Hence the recommendation that CUHK should grow to 11,500 fte.
The introduction of three-year courses will also mean an increased throughput at CUHK;
full from
given the present stage of development of degree work at the two polytechnics, the UPGC is of the view that 65 degree places is the highest level that can be achieved whilst maintaining quality and the highest possible standards. The increase from 40% by 25% to 65% in degree places already envisages a very major expansion within a four-year period for two polytechnics.
The UPGC considers
that its preferred expansion plan
would
represent the surest way of delivering the additional numbers within the tight timetable envisaged, whilst maintaining highest standards of quality. The Committee has also informed Government that it will be monitoring the plan closely and will be considering measures to achieve maximum cost-effectiveness (e.g. review of student:staff ratio) and to ensure value for money generally.