Court
MWANA
VVC
www KUHU
I
B
Cape No.
Coram
Prosecution
Defendants
:
WS 11939-42/90 ; WS 14391-2/90
WS 15136-43/90
Miss Betty KWAN
Christopher Coghlan, Sr. Crown Counsel,
and Patrick LI, Crown Counsel
Present
All are represented by Daniel FUNG, q.C., Martin LIAO and POON Shiu-chor instructed
by M/S. Woo, Kwan, Lee & Lo.
thia case,
I have had a chance to consider all the evidence in
When I did so, I bore in mind three things. First,
it is always for the Prosecution to prove their case beyond a
reasonable doubt. Second, to consider the case against each
Dofendant on each of the charges separately. Third, to consider
the evidence in the light of Defence Counsel's final submissions.
The Prosecution's case was presented by way of
Admitted Facts under S650 of the Criminal Procedure Ordinance,
Cap. 221. The whole of the Prosecution's case was therefore
contained in the pages of the Admitted Facts, Exh. 21.
It should be noted here that the "authority" and/or
"permits" referred to in pections 4(17) and 4(29) are "negative avermenta". The Defence have adduced no evidence relating to
this aspect of the chargée.
...../2
2