No.
Date
......
of December 1988. When my trial finally started, the prosecution first introduced three witnesses ; MR, ARIMITH, who was
i
incharge of the Case. A policeman who followed WONG LAP PONG (due to information received) from his arrival in Bangkok too CHIANG MAI and than too Phuket. The other witness was also a policeman, who was involed during the arrest in Phuket. Basically, what they had to say regarding me, was that I was never in the company and of the other defendents, except on the morning of the arrest. The police had imformation only about the other's and had followed them from their arrival. in Bangkok, up to CHAING MAI and than on to Phuket.
Also introduced on this day were.
photographs taken during the investigation Conly
ones of me where, when I was in Phuket) however no photos of me being in possession of etheir the herein or.
the suitcases).
The police also presented statments that we all made at Phuket. As I've already said previously they all said that I had nothing to do with the heroin. I was just sharing a taxi to the
to do with the
airport.
The next time I went to court the prosecution introduced more witnesses; The taxi driver and hotel receptionest from Phuket... as
well as the statements made by my corodefendants and myself and the translaters at the metropoliten narcotics policestation in Bangkok...
Up until this time, the police had conviently "forgotten" or could'nt remember who actually had possession of the suitcases...
8mm