2
; Mr Brown ERD
€316 replycudios PA MLA
us quotie about this. Grateful wuld diar a draft reply with. and will, NCAA
Carler Haswell
CONFIDENTIAL C
FM HONG KONG
Biran tert/NAD
GBids
to Sic in Stopt.
Hony Kany
CONFIDENTIAL
MUNH
026675
KCHIwator wath MDLIAN 7537
Ходде pun 4/5
དབབ་ན་མང་
Nir× 376/393/1
1. MEAD
pl. Check that ACAD and ktij heled in his.
HKD
2612
TELNO 1376
OF 020845Z MAY 8
ра
2.
ERD
TO PRIORITY FCO -
may
!
1
MA 1999
also will to see - My lead in Mistical Igal Assistance, Itch.
3. We should see a drift thu. before it issues, yo
DRUG TRAFFICKING (RECOVERY OF PROCEEDS) BILL 1989:
DESIGNATION OF COUNTRIES
1. OUR DRUG TRAFFICKING
show
gloss. We with newt
that we care and any HK.
any diff two for the 1957 angle.
(RECOVERY OF PROCEEDS) BILL 1989 HAS
}
PROVISIONS FOR THE DESIGNATION OF COUNTRIES FOR THE PURPOSES OF ENFORCING EXTERNAL CONFISCATION ORDERS. THE AMERICANS ARE VERY KEEN
TO BE SO DESIGNATED AS SOON AS OUR BILL BECOMES LAW. THEY HAVE INDICATED THAT, AS AN INTERIM ARRANGEMENT PENDING A BILATERAL AGREEMENT ON THIS, THEY COULD LET US KEEP ALL THE MONEY CONFISCATED IN HK (AS FAR AS U.S. CASES GO), IF THEY WERE DESIGNATED.
2. WE ARE AWARE THAT UNDER THE UN CONVENTION AGAINST ILLICIT DRUG TRAFFICKING, PARTIES ARE OBLIGED TO RENDER LEGAL ASSISTANCE ON DRUG MATTERS TO ONE ANOTHER. THE QUESTION OF DESIGNATION OF COUNTRIES IN THIS CONTEXT, WHICH WILL ARISE WHEN THE CONVENTION HAS BEEN APPLIED TO HK, IS A MATTER FOR SEPARATE CONSIDERATION. THE PURPOSE OF THIS COMMUNICATION IS TO SEEK YOUR VIEWS ON THE QUESTION OF DESIGNATION
UNDER OUR NEW BILL BEFORE THE UN CONVENTION IS APPLIED TO HK.
3. IN THE PAST YEAR OR SO WE HAVE BEEN UNDER CONSTANT PRESSURE FROM
THE AMERICANS FOR GREATER MUTUAL LEGAL ASSISTANCE ON DRUG MATTERS.
PART OF OUR RESPONSE TO SUCH PRESSURE HAS BEEN THAT OUR RECOVERY OF PROCEEDS BILL WOULD OPEN UP NEW AREAS FOR MUTUAL ASSISTANCE. IT WOULD BE DIFFICULT AND INADVISABLE TO POSTPONE THE CONSIDERATION OF
DESIGNATION UNTIL AFTER THE NEW UN CONVENTION HAS BEEN APPLIED TO HK.
4. ON THIS BASIS WE HAVE CONSIDERED A NUMBER OF OPTIONS:
(A) TO DESIGNATE THE U.S. UNILATERALLY AS PROPOSED BY THEM, WITH WHATEVER NECESSARY CONDITIONS AS PERMITTED BY THE NEW ORDINANCE
PROVIDED IN THE ORDER OF THE GOVERNOR-IN-COUNCIL.
THE AMERICAN OFFER TO LET US KEEP ALL THE MONEY APPEARS GENEROUS SUPERFICIALLY. HOWEVER, MY LEGAL ADVISERS TELL ME THAT IF OUR GOAL WERE MAINLY MONEY, WE COULD OBTAIN IT BY OURSELVES BY TAKING EXTRA- TERRITORIAL JURISDICTION AND INVITING THE U.S. TO PROVIDE US WITH THE
EVIDENCE. THE DISADVANTAGE OF OPTION A IS THAT IT DOES NOT PROVIDE
PAGE
1
CONFIDENTIAL