CONFIDENTIAL
XCC(88) 105
Proposed Procedure
5
We have
carefully
Page
3
examined the expressions of interest teceived in 1987 and have undertaken
a study of CTV systems abroad. It has become clear that the best expertise available on the implementation of CTV, linked with an understanding of the special needs of Hong Kong (particularly the need for local programming to meet Hong Kong's linguistic and cultural peculiarities), is to be found in the
the main companies now expressing interest in the Hong Kong CTV licence. We are also aware that modern trends in CTV services and technical innovation overseas are changing rapidly and therefore to teach firm conclusions at this stage about the detailed nature of the future CTV
CTV system
system in Hong Kong might have the result of deterring highly imaginative and up-to-date proposals. We consider that in such circumstances, the most sensible way to proceed is to invite local and overseas parties interested to make detailed proposals for implementation of CTV subject to certain basic considerations spelled out in this paper.
6
The Broadcasting Authority Ordinance (No. 49/87) empowers the BA to administer the provisions of the Television Ordinance (Chapter 52). The Television Ordinance does not govern CTV. It is proposed that when legislation is ultimately drafted for the
the implementation of CTV, provision should be made for the administration of its provisions by the BA as well.
7
Following initial consideration by the BA (see paragraph 9) of which proposals meet our intentions to the greatest extent while offering the most attractive package in terms of programming, feasibility and
and technical ability, we propose to shortlist the proposals and draw up detailed proposals for the regulatory framework based on the proposals under consideration. Members will then be invited to consider the BA's conclusions and recommendations. This approach flexible and similar procedures have been successfully followed in the U.S.A.
is
8
and
It is
is stressed that the fact that legislative regulatory proposals have been formulated in consultation with the potential licensee will in no way fetter the consideration of the draft legislation by the legislature and this will be
made clear to potential licensees. The advantage of
proceeding in this manner is that we would be able to submit a bill to the legislature with an assurance that parties with a detailed knowledge of CTY operation consider its provisions workable. Any proposals by prospective cable
cable broadcasters concerning the regulatory framework, will, of course, be considered most critically by the Administration.
CONFIDENTIAL