1
CONFIDENTIAL
HONG KONG AND THE IVORY TRADE
1.
2.
International Buy Out Fund
Generally agreed this is non-starter (Convention does not
provide for compensation; other CITES parties unlikely to
contribute to fund primarily for Hong Kong's benefit; could
lead to calls for compensation for Southern African states).
Six Month Reservation on Hong Kong's Behalf
Arguments for entering a reservation
(a) Duty to act on Hong Kong's behalf
Hong Kong is a party to CITES through the UK's
ratification. It cannot enter a reservation on its own
behalf. Well established tradition of HMG acting on Hong
Kong's behalf in international fora where Hong Kong has no independent voice. (cf the GATT before Hong Kong became a
separate contracting party).
There is a precedent in CITES: HMG entered a reservation
on Hong Kong's behalf when CITES controls were first
introduced on trade in ivory in 1977.
We could argue that we have no choice but to act for Hong
Kong. Could make it clear that this in no way reflects HMG's
own policy on the substance of the issue.
(b) UK/Hong Kong Relations: Perception of UK's Commitments to
Hong Kong
Would
Failure to enter reservation on a matter of real importance to territory would seriously damage perceptions of UK. become an issue of principle.
PTAAOJ
CONFIDENTIAL
Page 60Page 61