CONFIDENTIAL
3.
To make progress on the first of these points, we first need a response from Vietnam to our Ambassador's recent approach. If the Vietnamese are prepared to see British voluntary agencies develop such projects, the next stage would be for ODA to call in senior staff of the main agencies likely to be interested (eg
SCF, World Vision, Christian Aid) and invite them to put forward
proposals. We cannot of course be sure that they will be ready
to cooperate in this way, particularly if to do so might be seen
as supporting a policy of involuntary repatriation. A meeting has already been arranged for 5 January to debrief on the recent ODA/FCO visit to Cambodia, and this would provide a potential opportunity to explore the subject of Vietnam. ODA's
contribution to this element would be found from the £5 million
of additional funds recently agreed by the Treasury. Funds would be disbursed through methods analogous to the Joint Funding Scheme, and would not involve any government to government agreements, though the Vietnamese Government would no doubt wish to sanction whatever schemes the voluntary agencies propose.
4.
Extension of the Joint Funding Scheme itself to Vietnam
could be done by simple administrative action. It would then be
for voluntary agencies to put forward projects to ODA in the
normal way within the existing allocation for the Joint Funding
Scheme. Again, there would be no need for formal inter-governmental agreements.
Technical Assistance
5.
Funds have been earmarked in the Unallocated Reserve
exercise for an initial £100,000 for technical assistance to
Vietnam in 1990/91. The level of future funding would be settled in the next Aid Framework exercise starting in April.
6. In the first year at least these funds would be used essentially for two purposes: training of Vietnamese in the UK (or possibly in third countries) and a normal Heads of Mission
CONFIDENTIAL