17/8
Mr Stane Mr Haswell
17
W1/4
18/8
Mr
Pohur,
HKD
CONFIDENTIAL
209
From: A R Brenton
MK B
243 la
United Nations Dept
Date: 17 August 1989
2 £
CC: Mr Gillmore Mr Haswell,
HKD
Mr Whitehead, News Dept PS/Mr Maude PS/Lord Brabazon
Already
VIETNAMESE BOAT PEOPLE: REPATRIATION
1.
2.
I have seen Mr Haswell's interesting minute of 15 August.
are
I find it difficult to resist the feeling that our search for "acquiescent non volunteers" is leading us up a blind alley. It has, however, as Mr Haswell points out, brought us to what in both political and practical terms is undoubtedly the key questions we prepared to use force? Hong Kong (telno 2719) are - although they do not explain how we could justify to public opinion the use of the word 'acquiescent' to describe VBPS who have to be frogmarched into police wagons. I very much share Mr Haswell's view that the disadvantages in terms of UK and world public opinion, the US, UNHCR and so on mean that we should firmly and explicitly rule out the use of force at least for the present. By so doing we must substantially improve the chances of our reaching some sort of agreement with the US following Mr Gillmore's talks there earlier this week, and that in turn could open the way to greater cooperation from Mr Hocké on the monitoring of returned VBPS.
3. I would add two other points:
we are currently
We should surely
(a) I am not sure that a letter to Mr Hocké, as contemplating, would by itself be much use. be aiming for a Minister to have a good go at persuading him in person after we have followed up the progress Mr Gillmore has made with the Americans. Any letter could point the way towards such a meeting.
taken care of
& now
SEE UUMIS
-188
Genova telno 515
(b) I very much share Mr Haswell's view that we should be doing more to tackle Hong Kong public opinion, rather than simply bending to it. It may be that this is already happening, but I see no evidence of it in the telegrams.
Who does 'we' meen?
MONACS
meen
W118.
17/8.
CONFIDENTIAL
ARRE
AR BRENTON