CONFIDENTIAL
2. As Mr Hum indicates, our main concern was that the
Portuguese should not achieve a better deal for Macau than
we were able to get for Hong Kong. It is clear that this did
not happen, even over nationality where differences between
British and Portuguese legislation are reflected. We will,
however, need to watch the immigration aspect referred to at the end of para 6 of the submission.
Thanks
6. is potentially
important.
huanghu
well
para The BNO Iight of trole argument may
reappear in HK.
7 May 1987
cc: Mr Gillmore
R
TIM RENTON
Mr Masefield, FED
Mr Weston, SED
Mr Fifoot, Legal Advisers
Mr Walker, Research Dept.
RJT McLaren
CONFIDENTIAL