China Law & Practice
Vol 2, No 7, August 22, 1988
"provisional fine" of 300 yuan per month was being paid.
EMPLOYMENT.
ia
Het
following documents:-
at 48 cú 1988
Practice Notos
a) Notice of Appearance in Civil Proceedings b) Power of Attorney in Civil Proceedings ni beta c) Return Form of Service in Civil bas a Proceedings
d) Summons for Civil Proceedings
No room in Shanghai: In the last issue e) Civil Ruling of China Law and Practice, we published albo f) Civil Judgement report on the Xerox joint venture in:s, g) Civil Mediation Shanghai conducting open recruitment bei. h) Decision
through newspaper advertisements (see II 6oti) Notice to accompany documents served, CLP 43). The ad stated that recruitment was gia t..
being conducted "with the concurrence of theatre. The Guangdong Courts are prepared to Shanghai Personnel Administration Bureau". be serve, on behalf of Hong Kong parties, the Mr Joe Chu of Xerox very kindly confirmedi 25. following documents:-
to us that the such concurrence did not 30 involve obtaining permission from the Bureau but that all necessary arrangements would be made through the Bureau. Mr Chuzir further indicated that the advertisement:51 restricted candidates to the Shanghai district and that recruitment outside Shanghai was not contemplated because of the severe art housing shortage in Shanghai
بود ومعه
INTERNATIONAL
&
High Court
a) Writ of Summons
b) Acknowledgement of Service
c) Directions for Acknowledgement of Service
ex d) Originationg Summons
e) Acknowledgement of Service of Originating Summons
f) Directions for Acknowledgment of Service District Court
eam to välidsil ut youdail livio rg) Writ for Debt or Damages Sood h) Writ for Recovery of Land
i) Writ, General Form.
Judicial Assistance - Hong Kong and Guangdong: In the last issue we reported... the conclusion of a judicial assistance agreement between the Hong Kong Supreme Court and the Guangdong High People's Court. Details of the agreement were not · available at the time of publishing that issue!: and accordingly we have attempted to pursue. the matter. Howevers attempts to obtain a cory of this agreement have been thwarted.! Most recently, we were told by a privatel source that thereyisin fact.no formall agreeinent but merely an exchange of letters between the Registrar of the Supreme Court and the President of the Guangdong People's High Court. According to our source, the agreement relates only to the mutual service? of documents. In this regard, the Supremet Court has informed us that:
soubory
"The Hong Kong Court will be serving, ron behalf of the Guangdong Court, ther
20
If such service is required, it will be necessary for application to be made for leave to serve out of the jurisdiction and, when that leave has been given, for the documents to be served to be passed to the Chief Judicial Clerk, Supreme Court Registry, who wil! arrange through the Registrar of the Supreme Court for service by the Guangdong Court. In due course, after service, formal Certificate of Service will be provided.
Documents for service in Hong Kong will be forwarded to the Registrar, Supreme Court by the Highe. Peoples Court of Guangdong and will be served by the Supreme Court by post or personally by the bailiff if such request is made."
We were also informed that the fee for service in China is "likely" to be HK$300,