2
very happy. We cannot really take this matter any further.
your people, who have to administer the system,
work as they desire, we are content.
If
think it will
We have made the correction on which you comment in paragraph 4
of your letter.
We
came
conclusion that you would have
would have to have
a new
It needs to
in be
terms
to the
clause to deal with paragraph 5.
appropriate for colonies, which as we see it, means departing
quite a way from Clause 11.
We are not at this stage replying to your paragraphs 6 and 7.
I now move to fresh matters.
If
on
the
one
of Acts
at different times, combines pieces of work done one
sometimes notices discrepancies. We think we have detected one
In the present occasion.
various amendments of
concerned with international conventions we referred to clauses
12 to 17 as being relevant: see, for example, the proposed
section 3A (2) (c) for the Internationally Protected Persons Act
1978. But when dealing with the colonies we had referred to
clauses 12 to 18. It seems to us that we got this right for the
colonies, but not for the conventions. In other words we do
need to deal with
conventions.
repatriation cases in relation to the
We have made the necessary corrections.