AIDAFI
RESTRICTED
9.
Need for authentic English text of Basic Law?
The
There is considerable force in the argument for this. Hong Kong Courts will be working on the basis of common law system, and will need an official English text to be able to function properly. Article 9 of the draft Basic Law provides that 'the English language may also be used by the executive authorities, legislature and judicial organs of the Hong Kong SAR'.
10. Provisions on the economy
We are well aware of the criticisms that some provisions in the draft (eg on a low tax policy, a balanced budget and open financial and monetary policies) are inconsistent with the Joint Declaration provisions stipulating that the handling of policies in these areas will fall within the autonomy of the Hong Kong SAR Government. There is a cogent argument that it is inappropriate to enshrine such provisions in the Basic Law. We feel sure that the Chinese authorities will take account of criticism of these articles.
11. Formation of the first SAR Government
This is a matter which is understandably generating much interest in Hong Kong. We are listening carefully to all views. recognise that it is right for the arrangements for the first SAR
But it is Government clearly to mark the change of sovereignty.
equally important that there should be continuity and a smooth transfer of government, so as to maintain confidence, both in Hong Kong and internationally.
12. Is LegCo entitled to debate the Basic Law?
We
It is natural and understandable that members of the Legislative Council should wish to express their views on such an important matter. The Chinese authorities have made clear that the debate is a matter for LegCo to decide. They have also made it clear that they welcome views from all quarters, including of course members of LeyCo. A debate is to be held in LegCo on 13 and 14 July.
RESTRICTED