сар
1
2
The labour sector is still dissatisfied with
weas
undment in the following area of all, the provisions
the bill on two points First
八三
workers
that discriminate against young people in the long service
payment scheme is still not removed.
According to the
certam percentage
old provision, young workers can only get the payment
at the discount and the younger these workers are,
the longer they will have to work in order to be qualified.
believes
The labour sector unanimously agrees that we should abolish the above
this(discriminatory provision and the duration of service for long service payment.
qualified
should be fixed at five years. Unfortunately, the amendment
in this respect.
this time has not been able to make improvemen
ment Secondly,
the retirement age for workers in Hong Kong including
civil servants is generally 60, that is why the labour
who have
always sector/believes that workers worked for over 10 years
and who have reached the age of 60 should be qualified for
on resignation
Can
the long service payment But the amendment this time is
لمى
able to provide long service payment only to workers who have
worked for 10 years and have reached the age of 65.
strongly
to
Iurga) the Government should remove these
two defects in next ref revision.
In addition, I would also like to point out some
of own worries.
worrying facts
extent of benefit
We were we
e-worried really about the
the long service payment scheme.
First of all, we know that there are more and more employers
who avoid binders exployment
بسته
avoiding the long term relationship with employees. They
Froin
#
are trying to escape the liabilities under the Employment
낫다.