/counts
Xplain
different ones.
One or more of these counts may reveal a
count of fraud or dishonesty in the commercial context
within the meaning of section 3(1) of this Bill, whereas
The amendment also
the other counts may fall
outsidek
Kexplain
ain the one the judge orders and all these
makes it explai
a preparatory hearing under this clause
ļc.
then,
in the above circumstances,
ᄉit.
(when a
tis bask
diy order will
X the
only related to the count, counts which reveal all the Biti for reveal
a case of fraud or dishonesty in the commercial context
under clause 3(1), but not the other
other counts in the
C
same findictine
indi
amendment I seek is in
amended form, n
Clause 13, the first
relation to subclause (a), which in
(a), which in its amended form
requires a prosecutor to serve on the accused and
delivered to the court, a statement containing a concise
account of/facts on which the
on which the prosecution case
prosecution case is based, a
of /facts
prosecution case statement. But it often happens
the
of that
primary facts contain in such a statement do not inform
le. adequately the accused, What the prosecution case really
because at the trial the prosecutor might invite the
jury to draw certain influences from
is,
this primary facts, these
and unless the accused is told beforehand what influences
le.
the jury will be invited to draw, He will not be in the position to understand fully what case he has to meet, le. And thus feaables to serve on the prosecutor the defence / unable
le is
Page 135Page 136
の