MR. TAM (in Cantonese) : Sir, I support the Protection of
Wages on Insolvency (Amendment) Bill 1988 because I
phenomenon believe that the Bill can remove an unfair situation that
has been around for years. At first glance, the number of
phenomenon seems insignificant workers affected by this unfair situation does not idok
great. The record will tell you that ever since the
setting up of
the fund, only eight claims involving 16
employees came under the ambit of the old regulations.
However, this may be because of the fact that some workers
and as a
already know about this provision with the result that
do
department cmcuned they did not file a claim. Hence, the authority does not
phenomenon have the relevant record. This unfair dituation has been
in existence ever
and cal
since the establishment of the fund
causing losses to employees. The amendment Bill now to be
introduced is at best be lated.
According to the new provisions, all employees whether
are
they be working for company or
ᄉ
an
individual, and
and/or payment in
regardless of whether the wages owed and/or
lieu of notice exceed $5,000, the Commissioner for Labour
is empowered to draw money from the insolvency fund for ex
gratia payment to the relevant employees
amendment Bill
is not
In fact, Actually
granting
Encession
adding anything ex
the
for the
then
ex affected employees, it merely gives the employees what is
entitled basic rights.
rightfully theißs. That is when employers owe them wages
and payment in lieu of notice, the insolvency fund can
Heir
and
come to their aid supporting the livelihood. For the
sake of equity, I support the Bill which protects the
workers interests.