other
of
but are
substances/which similar properties/not included in the
list in forder to
circumvent
3/not
the
regulations.
classification method under the United Kingdom
Consequently, I think we
we should adopt the United Kingdom
Classification Packaging and Labelling of Pangerous
which allow the authonéis to
Substances Regulations 1984
certain
chemicals
dangerous substances
Apart From X which are
on
ety of
but Kand
CAO subst
substances/ not the list and
yet possess certain properties of dangerous
substances
should still be defined as dangerous substances. May I
only
their
clasif
stress that we
we merel
should may adopt the way of defining
dangerous substances.
classif
If we
adopt their way of more successful in
able to protect dur
defintion, then I believe we will be
fable
grote
workers who have to handle dangerous substances, a more
effectiv
classify
ecting
Second,
Lon
Moreover regarding symbols to be used in the labelling of the
various
different types of dangerous
dangerous substances, I have been in
contacted with many trade unions and organisations and they
all feel that there should be additional symbols such as
'keep away from water'
reflected the worries of the employees and I think the
Administration should seriously consider their requests.
or
'carsinogenic'. They have
workers
on
labels,
the question of common Me Third, regarding commonly and chemical namender the
proposed regulations it is only necessary, for the chemcial
name or the common name to be labelled. However, if we
only put down the chemcial name, then probably the workers
will not understand it easily. And yet if we only use the
common name, there may be confusion and if we have an