2
lead to confusion if the term could not be clearly defined by legislation. We understand that the provision has now been
deleted.
le
With no exception, all the organisations which made representation to us felt that the listing of 231 chemicals in the Regulations was insufficient and should be expanded. The Administration's reply was that the list only represented the first step in identifying such substances and deletions or additions could be made as and when necessary. While the Ad hoc
le le group appreciates the explanation put forward by the
Administration, Members felt that the view of the organisations should be seriously considered and the list should be regularly reviewed to see whether it adequately reflects the range of chemicals used in industry.
Another point raised by the representations which is supported by the Ad hoc Group is the proposal to require importers or suppliers to provide safety data sheets for all dangerous substances used in territory. We understand that it is the intention of the Government to amend the relevant legislation to require suppliers of chemical products to formally provide safety data sheets. We hope this can be carried out as soon as possible.
The Ad hoc group also understands that the Labour Department will issue a code of practice to factory proprietors advising them of the potential risks in handling dangerous chemicals and of any additional requirements they should warn their employees. This is a very useful way to complement the effects of the labels. Factory proprieters should be made to understand that it is their responsibility to provide a safe working environment for workers, including efficient ventilation, sufficient lighting etc On the other hand, workers should also be urged to comply with all the safety requirements in their own
and
So
Page 255Page 256