3

safle

sc

procedures involved.

Mr. Hui has suggested that the fourt and

not the Director of Social Welfare should make the final

decision concerning the need for guardianship. Mrs. Tam

however, made it clear in her speech that the Director of Social

Welfare is best placed to decide upon such matters and that

to le adequate safeguards exist through the District Court and the le Mental Health Review Tribunal for appeals against the

le

continuation of guardianship in cases where the existing

arrangements are for some reason unsatisfactory. The Director

of Social Welfare will act when necessary as guardian of last

resort but I would like to emphasise that the essence of the

system is one of care and protection for the person placed

under guardianship and in normal circumstances, this would best

be provided by a relative or a caring person known to the

patient. When the Director has to act as guardian of last

resort, it is the intention that such arrangements should be of

an interim nature only, until a suitable alternative guardian

can be found.

ہو سلام

o/

le

2

The Ad Hoc Group was concerned about the need to provide

for supervision of the financial affairs of the mentally

the Council incapacitated and I would like to assure Members that adequate

statutory provisions for this purpose. do, in fact, exist both in

Part II of the Mental Health Ordinance and in section 12 (4) of

the Supreme Court Ordinance.

پھر

Another point of concern related to potential

difficulties when consent is required to medical treatment of

Share This Page