1 2
2
3
end
4
5
(b)
6
7
8
(c)
9
10
11
(3)
12
13
14
15
(a)
16
17
18
(b)
19
20
21
2 2 2 2
22
23/
24
disability, sexuality or indecent or offensive
language or behaviour;
whether the film denigrates or insults any
particular class of the public by reference to the colour, race, religious beliefs or
ethnic or national origins or the sex of the
members of that class; and
whether there is a likelihood that the
exhibition of the film would seriously damage
good relations with other territories.
other
The censor shall, in viewing the film and
considering the matters referred to in sub-
section (2), also take into account the following
matters:
the effect of the film as a whole and its
effect
likely effect on the persons likely to view the
film;
the artistic, educational, literary or
scientific merit of the film and its importance
entifi
or value for cultural or social reasons; and
(c) in relation to the intended exhibition of the
film, the circumstances of such exhibition.
Now Sub-section 10 (3) is now to be amended as agreed
between the Administration to the effect that (d) will be
25 added to Section 10 (3). This is still a positive, formulation
26
27
22298
30
31
32
clansi
having
which is the undesirable formulation in my view the effect that censors and the Board of Review will also take into account, as in Mr. Yeung Po-Kwan's amendment Article 19 of the
Politic
International Convenant on Civil and Political Rights.
However, during the course of the Ad Hoc Groups's
deliberations, an alternative amendment was considered which
ď uses what I termed the negative approach. The exploratory 34 draft was written by the Legal Adviser to the Office of
33
le.
35 Members of the Executive and Legislative Councils, Mr. Jonathan 36 Daw, and which I think should not be omitted from our open
stet