H
1
SECRETARY FOR SECURITY
here.
:
Sir, I think that the point
raised in the previous question is substantially the same
The two are not related. The Commissioner of
Police's list of recordable offences is one thing and what
the consulate asks and how the applicant replies is
another thing.
answer.
е
In
MRS. TAM : Sir, again I would like to refer to paragraph 4
of the
view of the considerable amount of
subjective judgment required by the criteria and the need
to make reference to social attitude, would it not be more
appropriate for
Governor in Council
what to decide
offences should be on the list and would the Government
consider issuing guidance notes for members of the public
Certificate of no Criminal Conviction applying for CNCC/ informing them of the list of recordable
енер
the
Certificati
offences and of the police behind granting (ENCE?
SE CRE TARY FOR SECURITY
No Criminal Currction?
Sir, the authority for the
commissioner to decide on these crimes, as I have
explained in the letter to the convenor of the OMEL CO
Security Panel, is under the Police Force Ordinance and
the commissioner's prerogative in this respect has
been
upheld by
judiciary review in the recent case of
Regina V.
LI Hok-ming. The Commissioner of Police
assesses society's attitude. I accept this can be
the
adjudged as subjective. But the Commissioner of Police
reference of the wide range of information from the
has