21

1

3:2

3

Re

4

5

6

7

8

9

le 10

(s).

11

say this is an appointment.

If the Chief Executive were to

WLet say: 'Let me and my wife and my young child elect Mr. Wong

into the Council", people would say: "Come on, come, you

Cannot can't keep it in your own family. If the Chief Executive were to say: "All right, let me give

you 600 people, all respectable people, but let me make sure that I can control

at least half of them.

What is the difference, I fondly

ask?

für,

fome

Considiving

that is the trouble. People are now developing

this idea of frand Electoral College which is nothing more, nothing less than perpetration of the appointment system. 12 And that is why pro-democracy lobbies in Hong Kong have

13

14

15

16

217

18

19

20

(21

22

23

8c24

+

er

is

-2401

changed their minds; and that is why they say: well, given the choice between directly elected members and indirectly elected members via the District Boards, of course we go for

the the forma. But if there is also a choice between indirectly glected members via the pistrict Boards and these appointed

m. members in effect but the euphemism will have it elected members via the Grand Electoral College, what I call the Grand Appointment college, then we say: "Well, let us keep the District Boards.

=

has been

so, it is for that logical reason that there is this change of mind.// Now, Sig, there are of est be two points

highlighted in the honourable Mr. Szeto Wah's motion. The first 10 point is that there are only ten, directly elected members in 26 1991 and the other is that these directly elected members

To

2253

27

le 28

Λ

E

should replace the ten seats currently filled by indirect elections from the District Board rather than for these

And not the directly elected members to replace appointed members. Sir, the key objection, as far as I'm concerned, to this part of the recommendation or policy decision in the Joint Declaration, is that that, globally, as a unit, this is, the composition of the Legislative Council is unlikely to change, so that even by the summer of 1994 no less than 30 members assuming we keep the

same numbers in this Council, no less than 30 of them will

તું

29

30

31

32

33

34

35

36

still be by appointment by the Governor.

M

Cap.

сар.

cap

Share This Page