1
2
3 مرات
SC 4
5
346 Cap: 7
8
SC 9
'two-thirds for, one third against' formula, I thought to myself:
'Mr Webb would
if he would have saved himself a lot of time and trouble
had
hon
if he would have had a word with my honourable colleague, Mr. Andrew Wong', for I am sure Hong Kong remembers only too well that a couple of days after the publication of the Survey office report, Mr. Wong had already come out with his analysis of views contained in the survey office report and arrived at a conclusion that every two votes that was against the direct elections, there were three for.
the fave that there were
What Mr. Martin Lee did
10. not mention was the three to four people in every ten
Λ'
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
le 19
20
21
Cap
22
23
24
2.5
2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
लै
26
27
28
29
30
31
Se 32
33
10
who
refused to say whether they were for or against but returned a "donot know were already also indicated in the report. Does that not give a clear indication that the community is indeed quite split on the issue of whether Hong Kong should have direct elections in 1988?
Sir, I oppose the motion.
MR, CHAN YING-LUN (in Cantonese):
Sir, in debating
the Survey Office Report, I said that apart from the necessity to collate all opinions, we met at the same time analyse the views given by the different boards and councils and also individual views sent to the survey office, because they are very clear and at the same time they reflect the different levels that they de represent. I personally have roughly analysed the information and I find that on the question of direct elections in 1988, the views are in fact extremely divided, and I do respect their views. Up to this point, I do not have any concrete evidence to show me the contrary.
decision not to introduce Even though I am a bit disappointed with the rejection of direct elections in 1988, I have no concrete evidence to go against the Government's decision and therefore I cannot
support Mr, Martin Lee's amendment.
34
35
36
DR IP:
Sir, I stand to speak
against the amendments on the grounds that the addition of the amendments so proposed may confuse the voting when Members