2
materials.
required to comply with the competition requirements
unproven
forms or
Architects were
also
l.c.
and to satisfy the Committ
resources
and
ttee that they had sufficient
experience to undertake the project.
There
was
no guarantee
that the winner of the
competition would be selected as the project architect.
2
بکھر
In this context I must clear up a widespread
misunderstanding
that
the
Planning
l.c.hover-ruled the Assessment fanel. This
The Assessment panel decided
competition
and their
Committee
This is not So.
the winner of the
decision was final.
The
decision on the project design was a separate issue
and was the responsibility of the planning for
kc.
lc.
2/lc. 11
心
high
standard
l.c.
anning Committee.
The Assessment Panel drew attention to the
Six
of all short-listed designs
Six
and
advised that all & met the technical requirements of
the Brief.
Before deciding on the project design the
le. Planning Committee
studied
Six
all designs
very
carefully and reached their decision unanimously in a
secret ballot.
بو
Their decision was taken properly and in good
faith, in what they felt were the best interests of
l.c. the niversity. They selected the design which they
l.c.
felt was most likely to achieve their aims and produce
a University which would best meet Hong Kong's needs.
le.