3
Bill 1988 has caused much controversy,
and even those who favour
the measure have been unable to find a kind word for its timing.
I also personally consider it to be ill-timed, yet I support the Bill as deferring the Bill will only cause more chaos
and complications.
I am not convinced that there is any urgent need to make
a time changes at this stage just before a decision on the political review is reached. The proper procedure is for the Administration to publish the White Paper on political reform in which a complete package of the future of the Urban Council, the urban District
lc le Boards, their relations and links are described in full.
When the contents are debated and finally agreed in principle, including a timetable for implementation, various related legislative amendments can be introduced by stages in this Council when Members will have a full understanding of the
complete package.
Such approach is far more acceptable than piece/meal introduction of bills without knowing the contents of future
related legislation.
There is an old saying that those who marry in haste repent at leisure, and this is a good motto for legislators as
well.
Skel
There is no dispute that we need constant changes to alt ensure our system will be in line with the changing situation, and indeed we welcome changes. However, it is important that these changes are well planned beforehand, and implemented step by step to minimise any unnecessary disruptions.
With these remarks, Sir, I support the Bill.
S4D6