(11) The issue involved in the interpretation of the Basic Law is essentially one on the relationship between the legal system of China and the judicial system of the future SAR.

Under the Chinese legal system, the NPC Standing Committee as the legislature has the power to interpret laws. But under the existing legal system in Hong Kong. the courts interpret the legislature

legal the

laws when adjudicating specific cases and does not give any abstract interpretation of the principles of the laws outside the legislative process. The problem is how the legislative interpretation under the Chinese Bystem is related to the judicial interpretation under common law system. Is there any conflict between the two? Will the legislative interpretation given by the Standing Committee undermine the Judicial independence the power of final adjudication of the HKSAR?

(111) Further

probleme

will

NPC

and

discussion

on these

require understanding of the nature of the law-interpreting function of the NPC Standing Committee and the procedure involved. But at present the people in Hong Kong have knowledge in this respect.

limited

2.

Political Structure

2.1

Focus of discussion

(1)

The public has been discussing political structure for years and a number of proposals have been published. from different circles have analysed and debated

Basic

two

People

upon the various aspects of political structure. Ever since the publication of the Draft

Law, people have been relatively cool-headed in their discussion. Most of the they are for or

reasons have not been

no new proposals

opinions have against which further explored. been published.

directly indicated that proposals but their

Up till mid-June,

have

1.4.2Questions to be resolved

(1)

What will be

the difference between the NPC Standing Committee's legislative interpretation of the Basic Law and Hong Kong courts' Judicial interpretation of the Basic law?

(11) If

the NPC Standing Committee shall interpret the Basic whereas the Hong Kong courts shall have the power of adjudication. in

Law

final what way will these two procedures be co-

ordinated?

1.5 Committee

for the Basic Law

1.5.1 Focus of discussion

The

Draft Basic Law mentions more than establishment of a Committee for the Basic Law NPC Standing Committee. The NPC Standing Committee seek the advice of this Committee beforehand when with certain matters relating to the HKSAR. The Draft Law. however, does not provide details for the composition, nature and operation of the Committee.

once

the

under

it

the

shall deals Basic

2.2

the proposals to provide detailed

(11) In-depth discussion is not possible because lack development: their proposera fail information on some specific issues.

method

of

for the

four

(111) The Draft Basic Law contains five alternatives

selecting the Chief Executive and alternatives for the method of constituting the legislature. But it is expected that there will be only one proposal when the Drafting Committee submits the proposed legislation to the NPC Standing Committee early next year.

Some people therefore believe that during the five-month consultation period for the Draft Basic Law, it is necessary to work out a compromise proposal acceptable to all parties. It hae Already been suggested that supporters of the various alternatives should start considering a compromise and, the spirit of mutual understanding and mutual accomodation, Jointly draw up a model of political structure which

in

will But there are One view is that

be acceptable to the community at large. different views regarding this suggestion. the various alternatives are based on different principles, it 18 considerably difficult to have

compromise. Some people also say that they would not compromise on the basic principles which they support. Since consultation has not been completed at the present stage and there has not been any clear indication of public opinon, some people are of the view that it is not the right time for compromise.

Questions to be resolved:

1.5.2Questions

to be resolved

(1)

*

(1) What 18

the nature of the Committee for the Basic Law? is it related to the NPC Standing Committee?

How

Do the various alternatives have any common basis objective to Berve AB the starting point for reaching a consensus?

and

: (11)

What

18. the

composition of qualifications its members have?

the

Committee?

(iii) What, should be

the working procedure of

the Committee?

What

(11) How can the proposers of the various alternatives be induced

to hold dialogues cool-headedly so that they

may have further understanding of the contents and principles of the alternatives

by one another and. through communication and discussion, may jointly draw up a model of political structure which is acceptable to all parties?

proposed

6

Share This Page