SEP 08 '87 14:33 HERBERT SMITH HK

15

!

ויי

7. On the alternative hypothesis that

thể Attorney General's claim, if tried, will fail the effect of having continued the temporary injunction until that time would only be to have postponed, not to have prevented, the exercise by South China Morning Post Ltd and the other defendants of the right to publish which it will, in that event, have been established that they had. The assessment of pidemages under the Attorney General's

cross undertaking will, nevertheless, be difficult and, coupled with the interest of the public in receiving information sooner rather than later, leads to the conclusion that damages would not be an adequate remedy for the defendants either.

8.

TY

f: M

-

The unhappy precedent that would be created in Hong Kong by 'failure to

1

}

"

restore the injunction. Adopting and

adapting now a passage from the

speech of Lord Templeman (13):

܀܀

་r །

"If the injunction does not continue in the present case an immutable precedent wild, have been created. It must follow that any disgruntled public servant or holder of secret or confidential information

{

relating to the Security

Service can achieve.mass

circulation in Hong Kong of

damaging trutha and falsehoods by the device of prior

dacak publication anywhere else

(13), at pp.211-212 of the transcript

1

J

P.16

Share This Page