1
e.
2
h
3
abeth
4
ves
5
6
7
8
t
9
rt,
10
11
y.
12
add
13
14
15
16
Date:
Time:
Reporter:
18.12.86.
9.0
PMO
-
9.50
& Privileges Ordinance.
That the comments or that the public condemnation should be made of a practice, of a consultancy practice, which hitherto has been of the highest professional standing in
In
Hong Kong for over thirty five years. It may well be that in the heat of discussion comments are made which may not really be intended. view of our consultancy report before you, may I suggest that the Director of Architectural Services be invited to review this specific aspect of the verbatim report and address the consultant's office separately on the matter.
CHAIRMAN: All right. Mr Webber
MR MOTTRAM: The name is Mottram.
I am very sorry,
Mr Webber could not attend, but I was involved in the supervision
CHAIRMAN:
What is your name ?
267
17
1
18
MR MOTTRAM:
ne
20
21
en
22
19
∞ = 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
23
25
Mottram.
M-O-T-T-R-A-M.
CHAIRMAN : Mr Mottram, this Committee is only dealing with the Director of Audit's report and on fact-finding of the Director of Audit's report. The Director of Audit's report specifically and clearly stated that the fact remains that there are
24 still leaks in the basement of the Queen Elizabeth Stadium and what
we are trying to establish is the facts and the circumstances leading to why there are leaks in this Queen Elizabeth Stadium project and this Committee is not really interested in cross-examination, but the facts have got to be presented to this Committee and I am glad for you to appear before this Committee so that you could point out, based on our verbatim report, on this particular case. But may I begin to ask some
questions on your submission. First of all, well back in 1976
26
27
28
29
те
30
31
le
32
your firm
>r
33
34
le
35
rgest
36
vers
w is ww w w
was your firm aware there would be leaks in the basement,
told by the contractors?
was your firm
MR MOTTRAM: Have you read the report ?