1
2
3
4
5
6
Date:
Time:
28.11.86.
8.30
-
12.30
Reporter: PMO
contractor in preparing a case substantiating possibly for use
of substantiating any claims for delay, it was mentioned that it
was largely due to a lack of detailed design drawings
MR CHEUNG:
Yes, yes.
7
MR CHEONG:
8
9
supplied to the contractor at the beginning.
It was also mentioned in that particular report that the contractor is experienced
10
11
MR CHEUNG: Yes.
12
13
MR CHEONG:
and that they had just completed a project
14
with the
15
16
17
18
MR CHEONG:
19
20
21
from the construction stage
MR CHEUNG: Prince of Wales Building.
the headquarters for the British Armed
Forces, and it was also said that in that particular consultant's
report that detailed drawings were provided to the contractor as
Correct ? I mean I can refer you
22
back to the pages
23
24
MR CHEUNG:
Provided as it progressed.
25
26
MR CHEONG:
Well, I am stating a fact.
27
28
MR CHEUNG:
Yes.
29
30
MR CHEONG:
31
32
33
34
35
36
Now, if after bidding and winning the contract,
on Bills of Quantities, and don't forget even at the beginning of the bidding there were certain simple drawings or at least drawings provided to substantiate the Bill of Quantities, even if there were
no detailed designs provided at that stage, I can understand that it
would be possible to bid on the Bill of Quantities, but when the
contractor would have accepted the offer or the tender and when the
179