132
Date:
Time:
Reporter:
1
2
2 3
4
26.11.86
8.30 am 12.15 pm
CNB
-
consultants wrong.
D of Ar S: Yes. Let me
O
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
CHAIRMAN :
I mean, do you agree with this?
I'm sure
there must be some documentary proof that the contractor has
and sure informed the consultants there will be water leakage
it did.
D of Ar S: To start with, it doesn't matter what method, even with the conventional tanking, there's no guarantee.
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
CHAIRMAN:
We're not talking about guarantee, Mr Lei.
I think we have to pay attention to these reports in here, and I'm stunned by the reason given by the consultants not to review really the cases because of the documents approved the drawings of using this waterproof concrete. It seems he doesn't care whether there will be a water leak or not after the stadium is built. I put a big question mark on the consultants, that's why I beg to differ on the opinion about even he was told. And I think this is a case of 137 if I assume the statement made in the Audit Report is correct.
D of Ar S: Yes, the report is correct, it's factual.
21
22
23
24
25
CHAIRMAN:
Well, if it is factual
26
27
MR POON:
You have got legal opinion or a second opinion
or not ?
28
29
30
CHAIRMAN:
Yes, is that the legal opinion from the
31
Attorney General?
32
33
D of Ar S:
34
35
CHAIRMAN:
From the Attorney General's Chambers, yes.
Attorney General's Chambers.
36
1
2