1
す。
2
3
4
5
6
Date:
Time:
25.11.86
2.15 to 5.00
Reporter:
JPM
were this procedure, we have already in fact made a few suggestions
and we have managed to whittle them down by a few steps.
MR CHEONG:
How do you know you are the pioneers?
ă
10
11
12
13
7
8
DTEIT:
CHAIRMAN:
We have been told so, Sir!
The fact remains Mr Director, it is a fact
9 that the Director of Audit's Report states the fact that the $8.6
million was paid out to the architects and then the redesign was done. I have been a frequent passer-by of Sha Tin Technical Institute, and I personally have an observation to make; it is a very nice-looking Institute despite the over $45 million cut!
14
15
DTEIT:
Yes, it is a very nice building, I would
16
d
17
18
agree, and I think the one at Tuen Mun if I may say so is probably even better; I do think the young people of Hong Kong in fact, deserve buildings of this standard.
19
20
MR CHEONG:
Better looking in relation to more
21
22
23
DTEIT:
24
25
26
27
expenditure in the public purse?
No, I don't think so, Sir. I think if you
are going to a building which is attractive, I think you will be more serious in whatever it is you are going to do inside. For instance, this building I find a very attractive building and I am sure a lot of serious work is being done here!
28
29
MR CHEUNG:
I think Mr Director, you have picked the
30
wrong example!
31
CHAIRMAN:
32
i
of the Committee?
33
34
DTEIT:
Any other questions from any other members Thank you.
Thank you.
35
36
(3.55 p.m.)
49