18
5 pm
Date:
25.11.86
Time:
2.15
Reporter:
PMS
1
2
3
4
completed until the summer of 1983 so counting from '83 onwards it
is only three years since the revision was last undertaken.
CHAIRMAN:
5
6
D of E:
Could you repeat that again? I didn't
You didn't get the point?
1
2
2 3 4 5
3
5
6
7∞
7
8
CHAIRMAN:
Yes.
8
9
9
10
D of E:
The Director of Audit said that it took us
10
11
six years.
11
12
12
13
CHAIRMAN:
Right.
13
14
14
15
D of E:
16
17
18
The date of six years to complete the revision of fees. In fact it is only three years because the '78 fees were not fully implemented, they were done by stages and they
were not completed until the summer of 1983. In other words, only
19 four years later.
15
16
17
18
19
20
20
21
222
CHAIRMAN:
The review?
21
22
23
D of E:
24
25
The review, yes. So we started the new fees,
not until September '83 could we start the new fees. If we were to review the fees the earliest we could start was September '83.
23
24
25
26
26
27
CHAIRMAN:
I see.
27
28
28
29
D of E:
30
years ago.
In other words, three years ago and not six 29 That is my point.
30
31
32
CHAIRMAN:
33
34
Is that a correct statement in paragraph 13? It said there are only three increases in school fees during the past 26 years, in 1960, '65, and '79.
35
36
D of E:
That is correct, yes, that is correct.
What
w w w w w w
31
32
33
34
35
36
2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2