4
on,
Regarding all the points that I have made earlier
the best approach, in my opinion, is that sponsors who
have not given their support in public must not be quoted
That will solve the problem.
by the candidate.
Second, to go one step further, we can disallow
altogether candidates making use of the name of other
people. The candidate can only make some objective
statements regarding his Own status or his Own situation
and not make use of the subjective views of other people
including the sponsors. If we have the written consent of
the sponsor,
there is always the problem of the sponsor
subsequently withdrawing the support. So we should only
allow objective statements
the candidate can only say
that I am the husband of SO and So and I am the
father-in-law of so and so.
not
suitable
Third, to go even further, some organisations are
in giving their support or endorsement to
candidates. There are such organisations. So making a
public statement that the organisation gives its support
to a candidate is not appropriate. Let me elaborate.
There are major implications of the
the amendments mentioned
in the Bill. There may be bad consequences. For example,
let us look at the registered companies, societies,
unions, mutual aid committees, owners' incorporations and
So on. In this regard, I feel that there must be some
objectives behind the setting up
up of
a non-profit making