-2-

SECRETARY FOR TRADE AND INDUSTRY:

Sir, I am not aware of the precise figures

in Japan, but to deal with the general question of safety labels or safety rules,

our policy is to only introduce legislation, safety legislation, or safety rules

for particular products when a clear problem exists which needs to be tackled.

We have a range of ordinances, for instance, the Pharmacy and Poisons Ordinance, to deal with particular products where a problem arises. This does not appear to be the case so far with toys, despite this particular example. However, we are

looking again at whether some new legal provision is needed which would enable us to

stop the sale of products where life or health is clearly threatened and where existing safety legislation cannot be used.

(in Cantonese)

Mr. LIU :

also

Sir, will the Government review other toys that will also cause

harm, for example arrows or darts ?

SECRETARY FOR TRADE AND INDUSTRY: Sir, certainly we can look at other toys

have but I have to say that the number of complaints or cases which we we had are very few and there is no sign that there is a general problem of dangerous toys causing significant problems in Hong Kong.

Cap

Mrs.CHOW: Sir, is Government aware that the Consumer Council has actually conducted

tests on toy guns readily available on the market supposedly of less than

guns tested two joules.pellets of the X have penetrated cardboard of 1 cm thick when fired

The

from a distance of 11 m.

Will Government be conducting similar

tests to establish whether present regulations are adequate and if they are found to be inadequate will they be revised to prevent future mishaps?

SECRETARY FOR TRADE AND INDUSTRY: Sir, yes, I am aware of the Consumer Council's tests

and it is partly because of that work that I stated in my earlier answer that

we would be looking again at the need whether we need some new legal provision from

this.

Dr.

and,

HO: Is the Secretary for Trade and Industry aware that certain types of toy guns with muzzle energy great enough to inflict actual bodily injuries are already banned from use in country parks by Agriculture Fisheries Department and are also banned in some private apartment blocks by their residents' managements? Can Government consider extending such prohibition to public housing estates and other public places?

Share This Page