NA
Noto Mr Mogger informed
in accordance with par 4.
Mr Muxam,
LIENINIO
We suk
146
15
Our views on the attached have
been sought. I have sidelined the main
points.
2. I think the reasons given for not accepty a sworn affidavit from Sir YK Pao as sufficient prout of ownership are
sound. There is no legitimate reason giren as to
why
such
grout
should not be given in
CODE 18-78
the normal way. If the request is
rejected, I do not think that Sir YK hould have reasonable grounds for taking this further.
3. Sir YK will of wure be seely the
Prime Minister and Searty A Jate in 23/10: he may choose to raise this
pro