2
and therefore we preferred variant 1 but we could live with variant 2 if necessary. It was agreed eventually that variant 2 would be put forward to the EFTA countries as a compromise proposal subject to political clearance in Spain, Portugal and Greece. Ireland raised the point that we should limit the derogation to "proceedings in personam" so that t
that eviction Rösler Rottwinkel. proceedings do not come within this paragraph. that there was a point here which would need to be considered.
in
~ It was agreed
This agreement on a compromise text for Article 16 was achieved in the absence of France who had previously been strongly
France arrived after lunch against any change to Article 16.
and on being presented with the proposal was prepared to accept it despite the inelegance of the phrase "touristic purposes".
The UK redraft of Article 17(1) was accepted without comment.
The Chairman's proposal for Article 17(6) (maintenance) was also accepted without comment.
Spain and Portugal will produce the information required in Article 32 et seq. "soon".
Spain lifted its reserve on Article 50 (authentic
instruments).
revealed seven
On
A tour de table in respect of Article 52(3) in favour of deletion (UK, Denmark, Germany, Spain, France, Luxembourg and Netherlands) four in favour of retention (Belgium, Greece, Ireland and Italy) and Portugal with no position. the French suggestion that the Judgments Convention itself might be amended by deletion of Article 52(3) during the Spanish and Portuguese accession negotiations (supported by UK in order to minimise divergence of the two Conventions) a discussion of entry
It was seen that into force of the Convention was provoked.
the Convention would be entering into force for the six original
for the UK I stated Member States plus Denmark on 1 November; our firm hope that it would enter into force for us
on 1 January
1987.
/3...